Your absence test was shorter than your decision cycle
A fortnight away without incident is often taken as proof the business runs itself. It usually proves something much narrower than that.
SBy Steve··5 min read
An owner takes two weeks off, keeps the phone mostly closed, and comes back to find nothing on fire. The conclusion drawn is that the business no longer depends on them. It is a comforting reading, and it is frequently wrong, not because the fortnight went badly, but because a fortnight only tests the decisions that arise inside a fortnight. Key-person dependence isn’t a single quantity. It is distributed across decisions with very different frequencies, and an absence only probes the ones whose cycle is shorter than the absence itself.…
Keep reading for free
Create an account to read the rest.
The whole library is free. No card, no subscription, no trial that
quietly ends. An account simply lets us know who we are writing
for, and opens every article from here on.
Free means free. We will not charge you for
the library, and you can read as much of it as you like.
Important: General information only. Rialto Bridge articles describe patterns and considerations that may apply to a business; they are not financial, legal, tax or accounting advice, and they take no account of your particular circumstances. Consider your own situation and seek advice from a qualified professional before acting.